Evaluation of risk assessment questions used to target blood lead screening in Illinois

Journal Name: 
Pediatrics
Authors: 
Binns,H.J.
LeBailly,S.A.
Fingar,A.R.
Saunders,S.
Abstract: 
OBJECTIVE: Beginning in 1995, Illinois law permitted targeted-as opposed to universal-blood lead screening in low-risk areas, which were defined by ZIP code characteristics. State guidelines recommended specific lead risk assessment questions to use when targeting screening. This study was designed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of Illinois lead risk assessment questions. DESIGN: Parents bringing their 9- or 10- or 12-month and 24-month-old children for health supervision visits at 13 pediatric practices and parents of children (aged 6 through 25 months and who needed a blood lead test) receiving care at 5 local health departments completed a lead risk assessment questionnaire concerning their child. Children had venous or capillary blood lead testing. Venous confirmation results of children with a capillary level >/=10 micrograms/dL were used in analyses. CHILDREN: There were 460 children with both blood and questionnaire data recruited at the pediatric practices (58% of eligible) and 285 children (51% of eligible) recruited at local health departments. Of the 745 children studied, 738 provided a ZIP code that allowed their residence to be categorized as in a low-risk (n = 456) or high-risk (n = 282) area. RESULTS: Sixteen children (3.5%) living in low-risk areas versus 34 children (12.1%) living in high-risk areas had a venous blood lead level (BLL) >/=10 micrograms/dL; 1.8% and 5.3%, respectively, had a venous BLL >/=15 micrograms/dL. For children living in low-risk areas, Illinois mandated risk assessment questions (concerning ever resided in home built before 1960, exposure to renovation, and exposure to adult with a job or hobby involving lead) had a combined sensitivity of.75 for levels >/=10 micrograms/dL and.88 for levels >/=15 micrograms/dL; specificity was.39 and.39, respectively. The sensitivity of these questions was similar among children from high-risk areas; specificity decreased to.27 and.28, for BLLs >/=10 micrograms/dL and >/=15 micrograms/dL, respectively. The combination of items requiring respondents to list house age (built before 1950 considered high risk) and indicate exposure to renovation had a sensitivity among children from low-risk areas of.62 for BLLs >/=10 micrograms/dL with specificity of.57; sensitivity and specificity among high-risk area children were.82 and.36, respectively. For this strategy, similar sensitivities and specificities for low and high-risk areas were found for BLLs >/=15 micrograms/dL. CONCLUSIONS: The Illinois lead risk assessment questions identified most children with an elevated BLL. Using these questions, the majority of Illinois children in low-risk areas will continue to need a blood lead test. This first example of a statewide screening strategy using ZIP code risk designation and risk assessment questions will need further refinement to limit numbers of children tested. In the interim, this strategy is a logical next step after universal screening.
1
1999
Volume: 
103
Pages: 
100-6
Keywords: 
10, 1950, 1960, 4030, 460, Adult, Aged, blood, Child, Child,Preschool, Comparative Study, evaluation, Evaluation Studies, Guidelines, Health, Human, Illinois, Illinois: epidemiology, Infant, Lead, Lead Poisoning: diagnosis: epidemiology, Lead: blood, Mass Screening: methods, Parents, PPRG, Prevalence, Questionnaires, Risk, Risk Assessment, Risk Assessment: methods, Risk Factors, Sensitivity and Specificity, Support,Non-U.S.Gov't, United States: epidemiology