The need for research in primary care

Journal Name: 
Lancet
Authors: 
De Maeseneer,Jan M.
van Driel,Mieke L.
Green,Larry A.
van Weel,Chris
Abstract: 
Making evidence from scientific studies available to clinical practice has been expected to directly improve quality of care, but this expectation has not been realised. The notion of quality of care is complex, and quality improvement needs medical, contextual, and policy evidence. In primary care, research is needed that takes into account the specific characteristics of its population and the presentation and prevalence of illness and disease. The context of the doctor-patient encounter plays a major part, and needs better understanding. At the policy level, issues of equity must be addressed. The knowledge base for family practice must be expanded by integration of multiple methods of comprehension, so we can bridge the gap between evidence and practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]Copyright of Lancet is the property of Lancet and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Publisher: 
Lancet
10
18
2003
Volume: 
362
Pages: 
1314-1319
Keywords: 
Belgium, better, clinical, Clinical Medicine, Comprehension, Disease, Evidence-Based Medicine, Family, FAMILY medicine, Family Practice, General Practice, Health, health care, knowledge, medical, MEDICAL care -- Research, Medicine, MEDICINE -- Practice, Methods, Netherlands, population, Prevalence, primary care, PRIMARY care (Medicine), Primary Health Care, properties, quality, quality improvement, Research, understanding, Universities, Washington